Sign in and build · Free to start, no card needed · add a card when you want more credit · see pricing →

SEO

A beautiful page with no title is a page nobody finds

Why every build here gets technical SEO by default, what the checklist actually contains, and what happened when we turned the same audit on our own site.

· · Richy O.

ameliasagent.com/app

Build a one-page site for Ridgeline Tree Care, a tree trimming company in Austin, Texas.

index.html · title, description, canonical, JSON-LDSEO checked: 21/21 · $0.0092

In short

Ask any model for a landing page and you get something good-looking with no title tag, no description and no structured data. Every page-producing build here gets the full technical SEO set instead — about $0.02 across a whole build, checked by an audit rather than promised by a prompt. We ran that audit on our own homepage first and scored 18 out of 23.

Ask almost any model for a landing page and you get something that looks good and has no title tag, no description, and no structured data. It is the single widest gap between what comes out unprompted and what a site needs in order to exist as far as a search engine is concerned.

What gets included

Every page-producing build gets a title at a length that will not be truncated, a description written for a human deciding whether to click, Open Graph tags so a shared link is not a blank card, a canonical URL, exactly one h1 with headings that descend in order, real landmarks rather than a pile of divs, alt text on every image, and JSON-LD structured data. More than one page and it also writes sitemap.xml and robots.txt.

It costs about $0.02 across a full build. A job that is not producing web pages — cleaning a spreadsheet, fixing a script — does not pay for it at all.

Checked, not promised

Instructions alone are a hope. An automated audit runs against the finished page and the build is not done until it passes, so a missing description is caught the same way a broken layout is.

Only mechanically decidable things are checked. "Is this description compelling" is a judgement and is not in there. "Is there one, and is it a sentence rather than a keyword list" is.

We ran it on ourselves first

It seemed only fair. Our own landing page scored 18 out of 23. It was missing a header landmark — the nav sat directly inside main, which also swallowed the footer — it had a 226-character description that Google truncates around 160 anyway, and it had no structured data at all.

All three are fixed. Which is the point: a check you have not run against your own work is a check you do not know the value of.

18/23our own homepage’s audit score, before the fixes
$0.02added to a full page-producing build
226characters in the description we used to ship
160characters before Google truncates it

One thing we will not do

The instructions explicitly forbid inventing data to fill a schema. No fabricated ratings, no made-up review counts, no invented addresses. Google penalises it, and more to the point nobody asked for it.

How it works Get started

Ship the page. Skip the missing title tag.

Titles, descriptions, canonical links, structured data and a sitemap are on every page it builds, checked before the build is called done.

No card. No install. Every answer shows its price.