Sign in and build · Free to start, no card needed · add a card when you want more credit · see pricing →

Looking for a GTM alternative

GTM charges $297 before the first email. And the LinkedIn half is on you.

GTM’s Solo plan is $297 a month plus usage credits, Agency $497, no free trial, and credits expire monthly (trygtm.com/pricing, read 19 September 2026). Its home page says of LinkedIn automation: “the risk lands on you rather than on us.” This does the email half with the same rules in the database — and stops there, on purpose.

ameliasagent.com/app/sales
The Sales screen asking who you want as customers: kind of business, where, and how many to find.

The short version

GTM, in three questions.

What it costs before the first email

GTM: $297 a month Solo, $497 Agency, plus usage credits — Us: $12 a month on Pro, and each email at cost plus your plan’s markup

Can you try it without paying

GTM: No free trial; a card up front — Us: Yes — find businesses and read the first drafts with no card

Where the leads come from

GTM: A licensed database of about 700 million contacts, searched on your behalf — Us: It goes and looks — the map for the trade and town, then each business’s own site for the address they publish. Nothing bought, nothing guessed

GTM and Amelia’s Agent, on the questions that decide it

QuestionGTMAmelia’s Agent
What it costs before the first email
$297 a month Solo, $497 Agency, plus usage credits
$12 a month on Pro, and each email at cost plus your plan’s markup
Can you try it without paying
No free trial; a card up front
Yes — find businesses and read the first drafts with no card
Where the leads come from
A licensed database of about 700 million contacts, searched on your behalf
It goes and looks — the map for the trade and town, then each business’s own site for the address they publish. Nothing bought, nothing guessed
LinkedIn automation
Yes — and their own documentation says it breaches LinkedIn’s user agreement and that the risk lands on you
None, deliberately. Email only, under rules that are written down
Whose address it sends from
Domains you register through them
Your Gmail, or your own domain — never ours. Replies come to you and the reputation is yours
What stops a bad email
A compliance gate in the database — the same idea, and a good one
The same, plus the claims check: a number or promise you did not write down holds the email with the reason, and the first three of every campaign wait for you
What it knows about your business
It reads your website when you sign up
It built your website. Your prices, reviews and brand are already here, and it can build the page a prospect lands on
Approving from your phone
No app
iPhone and Android — approvals arrive as notifications
Where it will write to
US rules
US today, and a contact anywhere else is refused with the reason rather than sent anyway

The GTM column is quoted from their own published pages as read on GTM’s prices and limits are from trygtm.com/pricing as published on 19 September 2026 (Solo $297 a month, Agency $497, “No” free trial, credits do not carry over), and the LinkedIn sentence is quoted from trygtm.com the same day. GTM launched publicly on 21 September 2026; check every cell against their site., not characterised. Where their page does not answer a question the cell says so — on a table whose headline is that nobody publishes the price, that is the answer. Check every cell against their site; that is the point of writing it this way.

What you actually do

Not a pitch — the screens.

It finds them
Contacts found for roofing contractors in Conroe, Texas, each marked as a business.

Type a trade and a town. It takes only the address each business publishes itself — the ones that publish none are named, not guessed at.

You approve
An email waiting for approval, addressed to a named company, with Send this one and Don't send.

Written for that one business, from facts you gave it. Edit it, send it, or bin it — nothing leaves before you say so.

Where they are better

GTM has a licensed contact database and a LinkedIn channel, and this does not.

If your buyers are VPs at software companies you have never met, GTM’s 700-million-contact corpus and its LinkedIn search through your own account will find people this cannot. That is a real advantage for that kind of selling, and it comes with the risk they name themselves. This is for a business whose customers are other local businesses that publish an address, that wants the compliance done properly, and that would rather pay cents per email than $297 a month to find out.

The question that decides it

A dollar is a unit you already understand.

Credits are a currency with no published exchange rate. Here the unit is a dollar: what the model provider charged us plus 20–30% — 30% on the trial, Amelia’s Chat AI and Pro, 28% on Pro Plus, 22% on Pro Max — with that rate under the composer before you send and what the answer cost printed on the answer. Free to start with no card, building plans from $10 a month billed annually, and a spending limit on from day one.

And if you want to know who is making these claims: a software company that has shipped for other businesses since 2005.

If you are still weighing it up

See the price before you spend it.

Type what you want on the home page — it estimates the cost before you sign in, and there is no card to start.

Questions

Asked, answered

Is there a GTM alternative that does not automate LinkedIn?

This one. GTM's own page says any LinkedIn automation breaches LinkedIn's user agreement and that the risk lands on the customer. Amelia's Agent does email outbound under a database-enforced compliance gate and does not touch LinkedIn.

How does the price compare?

GTM: $297 a month for Solo or $497 for Agency, plus data and action credits, with no free trial (their pricing page, 19 September 2026). Amelia's Agent: the plan you have, from $12 a month, with each email billed at cost plus your plan's markup.

Does it have the same compliance gate?

The same shape: no message can be marked sent without a stored verdict and an unsubscribe link, opt-outs live in a list with no foreign keys so they survive every purge, every field records its source and date, and retention is counted from collection. Plus a claims check: a draft cannot use a number that is not in your proof.